Click here to read this informative article by Pankaj Mishra at Bloomberg. The only problem with it is that it lacks historic depth. What Mishra doesn't mention is that the Chinese Revolution is deeply rooted in the progressivism of the Hundred Day's Reform Movement, a failed 104-day national cultural, political and educational reform movement from 11 June to 21 September 1898 in the late Qing Dynasty. It was undertaken by the young Guangxu Emperor and his reform-minded supporters. The movement proved to be short-lived, ending in a coup d'etat by powerful conservative opponents led by Empress Dowager Cixi. The reforms advocated during the movement read like they were written for presentation to the 15th Party Congress. They included:
- Reforming the examination system for civil service.
- Opposing corruption and nepotism through the elimination of sinecures (positions that provide little or no work but give a salary).
- Creation of a modern education system (studying math and science instead of focusing mainly on Confucian texts, etc.).
- Changing the government from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy (a republic with an appointed legislature).
- Applying the principles of the market to strengthen the economy.
- Modernizing and strengthening the military.
- Rapidly industrializing all of China through manufacturing, commerce, and state sponsored capitalism.
The 15th Party Congress and 16th National People's Congress have both put forth a program of social and economic reforms modelled on progressive legislation in the West. It could be called a Chinese New Deal, including an enhanced Social Security retirement program, the expansion and extension of a Medicare system into rural China, increases in the minimum wage, subsidized low-income housing, enhanced environmental protections and food and drug safety regulatory bodies modelled after the US EPA and FDA. This is all part of the push to increase urbanization and promote domestic consumption as the economic engine driving China's continued growth and development.
None of this is new to Chinese thinkers and policy makers.
No comments:
Post a Comment